AI – Anything Intelligent

The Intersection of Science and Public Policy

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

A Taste of Progress

Posted by mmiller12 on August 22, 2009

A blind man focuses intently on a sheet of paper upon which his daughter has written a word. The camera situated on his head relays its vision to the device sitting on his tongue, and within moments he proclaims, “dad.”

Erik Weihenmayer lost his vision at the age of 13, but in spite of his loss went on to amount many accomplishments that certainly don’t fail to impress. To name a few: he was the first blind man to scale Mount Everest (for which he was recognized by Time Magazine); he’s earned countless awards including a ESPY award and a Helen Keller Lifetime Achievement award; he’s even carried the Olympic Torch. And now, thanks to BrainPort Vision, he was able to get a glimpse of sight once more.

Wicab’s BrainPort Vision is a device used for sensory substitution that utilizes one of the more unique and non-invasive methods available. Erik was able to read the notecard by feeling the letters on his tongue, somewhat analogous to brail. Electrotactile stimulation is the basis for the technology. In a nutshell, a camera feeds information to an encoding device connected to a square array of electrodes that lies on the tongue. The user feels controlled and harmless pulses of current attempting to simulate what the camera sees in a tactile fashion. The sensation has been described as feeling like pop rocks or a carbonated beverage. “Hundreds of pixels on the plate tingle on my tongue, and together they form patterns and shapes that my brain interprets as the space around me,” said Erik. In addition to  “seeing” two-dimensional objects, users are able to navigate in three dimensions to some extent. In fact, Erik was able to walk through a forest, only aided by the device, to find his wife.

This technology is effective for more than just the vision impaired, it’s beneficial for those with inner ear issues as well—and perhaps more so. Maintaining balance is obviously of great concern, and this tends to be a problem for those with damaged inner ears. For this task, the same design is employed, but instead of a camera, the device contains an accelerometer. An accelerometer, used to measure tilt with respect to Earth’s gravity (found commonly in modern technology like the iPhone), is responsible for sending data to the BrainPort’s plate. The plate contains five stimulation points: left, right, front, back, and center. If the user tilts their head right, the right side (user’s right) of the plate is triggered. Those testing the device were told to keep the current as near to the center as possible. Wicab conducted a study of five individuals suffering from various forms of vestibular loss, or the loss of some ability to control balance. All subjects trained for 60 minutes, two times a day, for five consecutive days. They were tested before and after the trial:

  • All five subjects improved on at least one of the given standard balance assessment tests
  • Two subjects improved notably on the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) test, revealing a 23% increase in performance (from 77% to 100%) and a 26% increase in performance (from 58% to 84%)
  • One subject’s inability to drive in most traffic was effectively erased — a job saving transition

This device may have military application as well. Sight is sometimes difficult underwater, and BrainPort may be able to provide help with a soldier’s orientation and positioning. Perhaps if infrared cameras were used, enemies could be located more easily–proving especially helpful if radio contact is lost.

BrainPort has been compared to learning to ride a bike; in just minutes, spatial orientation is within reach.  And as with anything, practice makes perfect. Dr. Bach-y-Rita, the chief scientist at Wicab, phrased it:

…we do not see with the eyes; the optical image does not go beyond the retina where it is turned into spatio-temporal patterns of action potentials along the optic nerve fibers. The brain then recreates the images from analysis of the impulse patterns. Thus, for a sensory substitution event to occur, one need only to accurately entrain action potentials in an alternate information channel, which do not differ significantly for the individual senses. With training, the brain learns to appropriately interpret that information and utilize it to function as it would with data from the intact natural sense.

The eye is just one means of transportation to the visual world. Science is searching for methods to replicate the eye, and so far this technology has a lot to offer as an easily implemented, non-surgical option. While the idea of substituting senses is a bit out of the ordinary, it’s an entirely realistic portal for vision restoration to take.

mmiller12 studies engineering in Columbus, Ohio.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Pew Survey Shows Rift between Scientists, Public

Posted by anythingintelligent on July 20, 2009

On July 9, the Pew Research Center and the American Association for the Advancement of Science released a large survey of scientists and the public. The report, descriptively entitled “Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media,” highlights the gap between scientific knowledge and its spread into the general public: the very rift that we are trying to close at Anything Intelligent.

Pew found that the public holds science in extremely high regard:

  • 84% believe science has a “mostly positive” effect on society
    • 85% — “mostly positive” impact on healthcare
    • 66% –  “mostly positive” effect on food and the environment
    • about 70% believe science and technology “does more good than harm”
  • 70% believe scientists contribute “a lot” to society, behind soldiers and teachers
  • 60% feel government funding “is essential for scientific progress

The survey also asked scientists and the public about different issues; the disparity in results was striking. Scientists overwhelmingly believe in evolution (87%) and human-induced climate change (84%), views shared by a much smaller portion of the surveyed public at 32% and 49%, respectively. The graph below shows differences in opinion on these and other scientific issues.

Data source: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press

Data source: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press

Why does this large gap exist? When asked about several potential problems facing science, most scientists thought the “lack of public knowledge” (85%) and “sloppy news coverage” (76%) were sources of major problems. The results depict fundamental flaws in the public’s source of scientific knowledge. Large bodies of research accompany major issues like evolution, global warming, and nuclear power — work that much of the general public has little exposure to. As a microbiologist quoted in the survey suggests, perhaps our grade schools do not adequately spark scientific interest, an apathy that carries over into adulthood. (54% of the public did not know electrons were smaller than atoms.) The information that the public receives may also contribute to their lack of scientific exposure: only 20% and 13% regularly read science magazines and websites.

The rift in scientific opinion and understanding has profound effects on policymakers. They must juggle the evidence from science experts and their constituents’ popular opinion, two distinct and often contradictory forces. How can these be reconciled? The Pew survey illustrates the need to capture and elevate the public’s scientific understanding and awareness. The green movement is already thrusting new information and technology into mainstream discussions. Now, we hope the rise of the blogosphere and new media will allow more scientific issues to reach the masses.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Welcome to Anything Intelligent!

Posted by anythingintelligent on July 3, 2009

AI – Anything Intelligent is a new, collaborative blog focused on expanding the role of science in public policy. AI is written and edited by college students with varied interests in the applied, natural, and social sciences.

Despite attending different schools and studying in different academic fields around the U.S., our common philosophy is simple: to bridge the gap between scientific developments and their real-world impact on lifestyles, economies, and society. The scientific community grows with fresh minds tackling the next frontier in research and technology, yet a much smaller focus is placed on turning relevant advancements into useful public policy. At this weak and confusing intersection, major forces like industries, countries, and politics drive conflicting interests, often times resulting in a frustrating deadlock.

However, there are signs of increased movement between science and public policy, especially in today’s environmental and climate change movement. President Obama pulled the Nobel laureate and current Energy Secretary Steven Chu directly from the scientific community. None of Chu’s recent predecessors had background in academia: both Bill Richardson (Clinton Administration) and Spencer Abraham (Bush 43) were lifelong politicians;  Samuel Bodman (Bush, second term) held engineering degrees but pursued a successful financial and business career. It remains to be seen whether an accomplished scientist like Chu can push for science and technology in the political arena, although his arrival signals the next step to utilize science in policy-making. In an interview with National Geographic, Chu describes his view on the Department of Energy’s role:

“The Department of Energy is the biggest supporter of the physical sciences in the United States, but it also has a mis­sion to take what is developed in national labs and universities and transfer this knowledge to applied research—research that will lead to really new ideas about sources of energy and ways of using our energy more efficiently. So that’s one of the things the Department of Energy will be focusing on—how do we make that transition?”

We will cover this transition from scientific knowledge to application, and furthermore from applicable uses to policy decisions. Our ultimate goal is to emphasize and expand the discussion connecting science and public policy, from small but interesting developments in science to sweeping policy changes. We don’t seek to advocate a specific set of policies — in fact, contributing writers may disagree on policy issues. Any relevant and grounded topic is fair material: where science connects to policy, Anything Intelligent goes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »